U.S. Supreme Court Declines To Rule On Pennsylvania’s Extension Of Mail-In Ballot Deadline Before Election

Topline

The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request by Pennsylvania Republicans to speedily review again a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that pushed the deadline for receiving mail-in ballots back to three days after Election Day, but the order said the U.S. top court could still take up the case after the election.

Key Facts

The legal deadline for receiving a mail-in ballot in Pennsylvania is 8 p.m. on Election Day, but a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling earlier this month extended  it to to 5 p.m. Friday, November 6, due to the disruption posed by the coronavirus pandemic.

That ruling was being challenged by the Pennsylvania GOP, who asked the U.S. Supreme Court to declare the deadline extension unconstitutional.

There were no dissents in the ruling, though Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas said in a statement that the ruling “calls out for review,” implying the Court may take up the matter again after the election.

Justice Barrett, who was confirmed this week to the Supreme Court, did not take part in the decision because she didn’t have time to “fully review” both parties’ filings, the court said.

Earlier on Wednesday, Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar told county boards of election to “securely segregate all mail-in and civilian absentee ballots” received after polls close.

The statement from Justices Alito, Gorsuch and Thomas noted that segregation of the ballots that arrive after the polls close on Election Day would make it easier to cast them out if the Court ultimately takes up the case and overturns the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling.

Key Background

Pennsylvania is a key swing state in the upcoming presidential election, with former vice president Joe Biden leading President Trump by only 5.1 percentage points, according to an average of polls by FiveThirtyEight, and both Trump and Biden have been pouring time and money into the state. But Republicans have also been fighting the battle on another front, the courts. Aside from contesting the mail-in ballot deadline extension, the GOP also tried to have mail-in ballots scrapped if a voter’s signature on the ballot didn’t exactly match the one on file. A state court ordered election officials not to reject ballots if signatures didn’t exactly match, and a federal court dismissed the case. 

Further Reading

Pennsylvania election officials ordered to keep late mail ballots separate (NBC)

 Today’s 2020 Election Polls: Biden’s Up Big In Wisconsin And Michigan—But Not Pennsylvania (Forbes)

 U.S. Supreme Court Allows Pennsylvania To Count Mail-In Votes Received After Election Day (Forbes)

 Pennsylvania Ballots Can’t Be Thrown Out For Mismatched Signatures, Court Rules In Blow To GOP (Forbes)


Speak Your Mind

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Get in Touch

350FansLike
100FollowersFollow
281FollowersFollow
150FollowersFollow

Recommend for You

Oh hi there 👋
It’s nice to meet you.

Subscribe and receive our weekly newsletter packed with awesome articles that really matters to you!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

You might also like

Federal Reserve Reluctantly Embraces Even Larger Role In Coronavirus...

US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell gives a press...

How Savvy Out-Of-Work Hair Stylists Are Making Money Without...

With hair stylists out of work and unable to...

Tech Stocks Extend S&P 500’s Rally To Seventh Straight...

The S&P 500 rose on Friday, extending a six-day rally led by technology stocks...

ICICI Bank announces sharp cuts in fixed deposit interest...

New Delhi: ICICI Bank has slashed the fixed deposit (FD) rates across various tenors....